Maintenance Calorie Calculator
Maintenance calories are the daily intake that holds your weight steady. Estimate them as Mifflin-St Jeor BMR times an activity factor, about 2,686 for a 180 lb moderately active man. Then weigh in for 2 to 4 weeks and adjust from the trend, because the formula is only a start.
Your body
Calibrate with the scale (2 to 4 weeks of data)
| BMR (Mifflin-St Jeor) | |
| Maintenance estimate (BMR x activity factor) | |
| Maintenance from your scale trend | |
| Estimate vs trend | |
| Fat loss target (500 below the calibrated number) | |
| Lean gain target (250 above the calibrated number) |
Trend calibration: maintenance = intake + (lb lost per week x 500), from the rough 3,500 kcal per pound rule. It is a short window correction, not a long range promise; recalibrate every 4 to 6 weeks. All calculations run in your browser and nothing is uploaded.
Estimate the calories that hold your weight steady with Mifflin-St Jeor, then calibrate the number against 2 to 4 weeks of real scale weight.
Key takeaways
- Maintenance calories = Mifflin-St Jeor BMR × activity factor (1.2 to 1.9)
- A 40 year old man at 180 lb and 5 ft 10 in: BMR near 1,733, moderately active maintenance near 2,686
- Scale weight beats formulas: intake 2,400 while losing 0.2 lb per week means maintenance is about 2,500
- The 3,500 kcal per pound rule is a rough conversion, and NIDDK notes the body adapts over time
- Standard fat loss starts 500 kcal below maintenance; lean gaining sits about 250 above
On this page
What maintenance calories mean
Maintenance calories are the daily intake that keeps your weight where it is. Eat that amount on average and the scale drifts inside its normal water weight range instead of trending. The number is real even though nobody can measure it directly: it is everything a body burns in a day, called total daily energy expenditure, which bundles resting metabolism, digestion, and all movement from walking to workouts.
Two paths lead to it. The first is an estimate: a body size formula times an activity factor, which the calculator above runs in a second. The second is measurement from your own life: eat roughly the way you usually do for two to four weeks, watch what the scale trend does, and adjust from there. The estimate gets you within shouting distance; the trend data makes the number yours.
This page holds one job: holding weight steady. If the goal is a deficit or a bulk, the related tools at the bottom handle those directly, and the number this page produces is the baseline they offset from.
Step 1: resting metabolism with Mifflin-St Jeor
The Mifflin-St Jeor equation estimates basal metabolic rate, the energy a body burns at complete rest. In metric units it reads: men, BMR = 10 × kg + 6.25 × cm − 5 × age + 5; women, BMR = 10 × kg + 6.25 × cm − 5 × age − 161. Pounds and inches convert first: kg = pounds ÷ 2.2046, cm = inches × 2.54.
Worked example, a 40 year old man at 5 feet 10 inches and 180 pounds: that is 81.6 kg and 177.8 cm, so 10 × 81.6 + 6.25 × 177.8 - 5 × 40 + 5 = 1,733 calories per day. The four terms are 816, 1,111, 200 and 5, and they add up to that total. A 35 year old woman at 5 feet 5 inches and 130 pounds works out to 590 + 1,032 − 175 − 161 = 1,286 calories per day.
| Who | Formula | Worked example |
|---|---|---|
| Men | 10 kg + 6.25 cm − 5 age + 5 | 40 years, 180 lb, 70 in: 1,733 |
| Women | 10 kg + 6.25 cm − 5 age − 161 | 35 years, 130 lb, 65 in: 1,286 |
BMR is not the finish line; it is the floor. Almost nobody lives at rest, so the next step multiplies it up to a real week of movement.
Step 2: the activity multiplier
Total daily energy expenditure multiplies BMR by one factor that stands in for your week. The standard set runs from 1.2 for a desk bound week with little planned exercise up to 1.9 for hard physical work plus daily training.
| Activity level | Factor | What the week looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Sedentary | 1.2 | desk job, little walking, no planned exercise |
| Lightly active | 1.375 | light walking or 1 to 3 easy workouts |
| Moderately active | 1.55 | 3 to 5 workouts or an on your feet job |
| Very active | 1.725 | 6 to 7 hard workouts a week |
| Extremely active | 1.9 | physical job plus daily hard training |
The man from the worked example at a moderately active 1.55 gets 1,733 × 1.55 = 2,686 calories a day to hold 180 pounds. The woman at lightly active 1.375 gets 1,286 × 1.375 = 1,768. Pick the row honestly, not aspirationally. The CDC describes moderate intensity as effort like brisk walking, where you can still talk, and vigorous intensity as the level where conversation stops. When torn between two rows, take the lower one and let the scale data in the next section correct you upward.
The CDC's intensity measuring guide gives examples for each level if a row is hard to place.
Why the formula is only a starting point
Mifflin-St Jeor lands within about 10 percent of measured metabolism for most people, and the error runs in both directions. Two people of identical size, age and sex can differ by hundreds of calories a day in measured expenditure, thanks to genetics, muscle mass, sleep, and the ordinary fidgeting and pacing that never shows up in an activity factor.
The multiplier carries most of the uncertainty. It collapses a whole week into one number, and self rated activity skews optimistic; most people overestimate how much they move. A formula output should be treated as a hypothesis with a plus or minus 10 to 15 percent band, which for a 2,686 estimate means the true maintenance could sit anywhere from about 2,300 to 3,100.
That band is exactly why the next section exists. The NIH Body Weight Planner, built by NIDDK researchers, models how metabolism adapts as weight and habits change, and it exists because static formulas miss that adaptation. You can get the same correction for free from a bathroom scale and three weeks of patience.
Calibrate with 2 to 4 weeks of scale weight
Your own data beats any equation. Eat the way you normally eat and track your daily intake for two to four weeks. Weigh yourself every morning, right after waking and before eating or drinking, and average each week's readings so water swings cancel out. Then compare the trend to the intake.
If your average weight held steady, your average intake is your maintenance number, full stop. If the trend moved, apply the rough energy conversion that about 3,500 calories equals one pound of body weight, the same figure NIDDK program materials use. Maintenance = average daily intake + (pounds lost per week × 500). The 500 is 3,500 ÷ 7, and losing weight means your real maintenance sits above what you ate.
Worked example: three weeks of tracking shows 2,400 calories a day and a loss of 0.6 pounds over those weeks, which is 0.2 pounds per week. Maintenance = 2,400 + (0.2 × 500) = 2,500 calories a day. The formula estimate said 2,686; your body said 2,500, and your body wins.
| Trend over 2 to 4 weeks | Weekly change | Correction to intake |
|---|---|---|
| weight steady | 0 | none: intake is maintenance |
| down 0.6 lb in 3 weeks | 0.2 lb lost | add 100 |
| down 1.5 lb in 3 weeks | 0.5 lb lost | add 250 |
| up 0.75 lb in 3 weeks | 0.25 lb gained | subtract 125 |
Be honest about the limits of the 3,500 rule. NIDDK's own researchers point out that the body adapts to a deficit by burning less, so long range projections built on the rule overshoot, which is why the Body Weight Planner exists. Over a two to four week window with a small trend, the rule is a good enough correction. Over months, recalibrate again. People with unusual metabolism or sedentary routines, the cases NIDDK flags, should lean even harder on scale data.
Cutting or gaining from your maintenance number
Once maintenance is calibrated, every goal becomes an offset from it. The traditional arithmetic uses 3,500 calories per pound: a 500 calorie daily deficit predicts about a pound of fat loss a week, and a modest surplus supports muscle gain. As the last section said, the body adapts and the prediction decays, so treat the table as a starting dose rather than a contract, and re-measure every four to six weeks.
| Goal | Daily offset from maintenance | Pace on paper |
|---|---|---|
| slow fat loss | 250 below | about 0.5 lb per week |
| standard fat loss | 500 below | about 1 lb per week |
| hold weight | none | steady |
| lean muscle gain | 250 above | about 0.5 lb per month with training |
| faster gain | 500 above | faster, with more fat gain |
Smaller offsets are easier to hold and easier to correct when the scale disagrees. Maintenance also moves as you do: a smaller body burns less, so the person who dieted from 180 to 170 pounds is maintaining on a smaller number than the 2,686 the formula first gave. The calorie deficit calculator on this site takes the deficit side further with timelines, and the TDEE calculator explains each activity factor in more depth.
How this page relates to the other calorie tools
Three tools on this site share the same bones, and each commits to a different question. The TDEE calculator is the general purpose version: BMR times activity factor, with the full breakdown of each multiplier, useful when the estimate itself is what you want explained. The calorie deficit calculator starts from a loss goal and works backward to intake and timeline. This page holds one narrow job: the intake that keeps weight flat, plus the scale weight method that turns a formula guess into a measured personal number.
Use this page first if maintaining is the goal, or whenever a deficit or surplus plan needs a trustworthy baseline to offset from. A deficit picked off an uncalibrated estimate is the most common way cutting plans fail quietly, so even if the destination is the deficit tool, the two to four weeks of weighing described above still pays for itself.
Recalibrate whenever life changes shape: a new job, a training block, a five pound move on the scale, or a season that changes how much you walk. Maintenance is a moving target with a lag. The formula aims, the scale confirms, and a check every four to six weeks keeps both current.
Frequently asked questions
How do I calculate maintenance calories?
Estimate BMR with Mifflin-St Jeor, then multiply by an activity factor from 1.2 to 1.9. A 40 year old, 180 lb, moderately active man lands at about 2,686 calories a day.
What is the Mifflin-St Jeor formula?
BMR = 10 × kg + 6.25 × cm − 5 × age + 5 for men, and − 161 instead of + 5 for women. It is the standard resting metabolism equation used across nutrition practice.
Which activity factor should I pick?
Match your whole week: 1.2 for a desk bound week with no workouts, 1.375 for light movement, 1.55 for 3 to 5 workouts, 1.725 for near daily hard training, 1.9 for a physical job plus training.
How accurate is a maintenance calorie estimate?
Mifflin-St Jeor is within about 10 percent of measured metabolism for most people, but individual variation runs wider. Treat the output as a starting hypothesis with a 10 to 15 percent band.
How do I find my true maintenance with the scale?
Track intake and weigh daily for 2 to 4 weeks, then compare the weekly weight trend to the average intake. Steady weight means the intake is maintenance; a trend calls for the 500-calorie-per-pound-per-week correction.
I eat 2,400 calories and lose 0.5 lb a week. What is my maintenance?
About 2,650. The loss implies a 250 calorie daily deficit (0.5 × 500), so maintenance = 2,400 + 250.
Is 3,500 calories per pound exact?
No. It is a rough conversion that NIDDK materials still use for short windows, but the body adapts to a deficit and burns less over time, so long projections overshoot. Recalibrate from the scale as you go.
How much below maintenance should I eat to lose fat?
A 500 calorie daily deficit predicts about 1 lb per week under the 3,500 rule, and 250 below predicts about 0.5 lb. Slower deficits are easier to hold and easier to correct.
How much above maintenance builds muscle?
About 250 calories a day supports slow, mostly lean gain for most trainees. Larger surpluses speed the scale up but add fat along with the muscle.
Why did my maintenance drop as I lost weight?
A smaller body burns less at rest and in motion, and the body also adapts to a prolonged deficit. Recalibrate every 5 lb of scale change or every couple of months.
Should I eat back the calories I burn exercising?
No, not on top of an activity factor. The 1.375 to 1.9 multipliers already price average exercise into maintenance, so adding workout calories again double counts them.
How is this different from a TDEE calculator?
The math is the same; the job is different. The TDEE calculator explains the estimate itself, while this page focuses on holding weight and on calibrating the estimate against 2 to 4 weeks of real scale data.
How often should I recheck my maintenance number?
Every 4 to 6 weeks, or after a 5 lb change on the scale, a new training block, or a big change in daily movement. The trend method takes about two weeks each time.
Do I need to hit maintenance exactly every day?
No. Bodies respond to the weekly average, not to any single day. Hit the number on average across a week and the scale trend will reflect it.
Spotted a wrong number or a broken result?
More Health tools
- 10-Year ASCVD Calculator
- 10-Year ASCVD Risk Calculator
- 10-Year CV Risk Calculator
- 10-Year CVD Risk Calculator
- 10-Year CVD Risk Calculator
- 10-Year Cardiac Risk Calculator
- 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk Calculator
- 10-Year Fracture Risk Calculator
- 10-Year Heart Risk Calculator
- 10-Year Risk Calculator
- 10-Year Stroke Risk Calculator
- 10-Years ASCVD Risk Calculator
- 6-Minute Walk Test Calculator
- A1C to Blood Sugar Calculator
- Adjusted Body Weight Calculator
- Alcohol Units Calculator
Fee schedules, rates and rules change without notice. Always confirm important figures with the official source before you rely on them.