Peak to Peak Voltage Calculator
A 120 volt RMS sine wave is 339.4 volts peak to peak, since the peak is 1.414 times the RMS value. Enter any one of the three, pick sine, triangle or square, and the calculator returns the other two using the crest factor of each shape.
| Peak to peak | |
| Peak | |
| RMS | |
| Crest factor used | |
All three assume a symmetric wave centered on zero volts. The calculations run in your browser, and nothing you type is uploaded or stored.
Type any one of RMS, peak or peak to peak voltage, pick the waveform, and get the other two, including the crest factor for each shape.
Key takeaways
- Vpp = 2 x Vp, and for a sine wave Vp = 1.414 x Vrms, so Vpp = 2.828 x Vrms
- A 120 V US outlet swings 339.4 V peak to peak, and a 230 V EU outlet swings 650.5 V
- Triangle waves use 3.464 x Vrms and square waves use 2.000 x Vrms, because RMS depends on wave shape
- A 3.3 V ADC input accepts a sine up to 1.167 Vrms, which is 3.3 V peak to peak
- Scopes measure Vpp directly; meters report RMS, so the two numbers never match on the same display
On this page
What peak to peak voltage means
Peak to peak voltage, written Vpp, is the total swing of a waveform from its lowest point to its highest point. A sine wave that reaches +50 V at its crest and -50 V at its trough has a peak voltage of 50 V and a peak to peak voltage of 100 V. For any wave centered on zero the relation is Vpp = 2 x Vp, whatever the shape.
Oscilloscope work lives in this unit because scopes show the whole trace at once: you read the vertical distance from the bottom of the ripple to the top and call it Vpp. Audio and power work live in RMS, because heating in a resistor follows the RMS value of the wave. The two numbers describe the same signal, and converting between them is one multiplication once the wave shape is named.
DC has no peak to peak voltage of its own, since it sits at one fixed level. The term still appears next to DC as ripple: a supply rail that wobbles 40 millivolts above and below 5 V carries 80 millivolts of ripple Vpp. The volt itself, on either scale, was pinned down by the 2019 SI redefinition that fixed the electrical units to exact constants.
The sine wave conversions
A sine wave's RMS value is its peak divided by the square root of two, about 0.7071. Working forward from a meter reading: Vp = Vrms x 1.4142, and Vpp = 2 x Vp, which combines into Vpp = 2.828 x Vrms. The 1.414 ratio is the crest factor, and OpenStax College Physics works through the RMS of AC waves in its circuits chapters.
A United States wall outlet reads 120 V RMS, so 120 x 1.4142 = 169.7 V at the crest, and the full swing is 2 x 169.7 = 339.4 V peak to peak. A European outlet reads 230 V RMS, and 230 x 2.8284 = 650.5 V peak to peak. Those outlet numbers explain a wiring habit: insulation rated for 120 V must withstand a swing well over 300 V twice per cycle.
The 2.828 factor is where most wrong answers come from. It belongs to the sine wave alone. Apply it to a square wave and the result lands 41 percent high, because a square wave carries more heating value per volt of swing than a sine does.
Triangle and square waves
Each wave shape has its own ratio of peak to RMS, called its crest factor. The square wave is all peak: it spends the whole cycle at one extreme or the other, so its RMS equals its peak. The triangle ramps linearly and lands between the two. Deriving the numbers takes calculus; using them takes one line.
| Waveform | Vrms from Vp | Vpp from Vrms | Crest factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sine | 0.707 x Vp | 2.828 x Vrms | 1.414 |
| Triangle | 0.577 x Vp | 3.464 x Vrms | 1.732 |
| Square | 1.000 x Vp | 2.000 x Vrms | 1.000 |
Two quick checks with a 10 V peak to peak signal. Sine: 10 / 2.8284 = 3.536 Vrms. Triangle: 10 / 3.4641 = 2.887 Vrms. Square: 5.000 Vrms. At the same 10 V swing the square delivers twice the heating power of the sine, which is why RMS and swing get reported as separate numbers on the same datasheet.
Common voltages, both numbers
The table lists sources people measure, in the unit each one is usually quoted in, converted to the other two.
| Source | RMS (V) | Peak (V) | Peak to peak (V) |
|---|---|---|---|
| US wall outlet | 120.0 | 169.7 | 339.4 |
| EU wall outlet | 230.0 | 325.3 | 650.5 |
| 24 VAC doorbell transformer | 24.0 | 33.9 | 67.9 |
| Audio line level, +4 dBu | 1.228 | 1.737 | 3.47 |
| Headphone output, 1 Vrms | 1.000 | 1.414 | 2.83 |
| Function generator, 10 Vpp sine | 3.536 | 5.000 | 10.00 |
The audio row needs a note. Line level is quoted in dBu, referenced to 0.7746 V RMS, so +4 dBu works out to about 1.228 V RMS and 3.47 V peak to peak. Consumer headphone levels hover near 1 V RMS, which is 2.83 V peak to peak. Bench generators run the other direction: you dial in 10 Vpp on the display, and a meter across the same terminals reads 3.54 V RMS.
Oscilloscopes and ADC inputs
A scope is the natural instrument for peak to peak, because the measurement sits on screen: count the vertical divisions from trough to crest and multiply by the volts-per-division setting. A sine spanning 1.7 divisions at 200 V per division reads 340 V peak to peak, which matches the outlet math above.
ADC inputs care about the same number from the other side. A converter with a 3.3 V input range clips anything beyond 3.3 V peak to peak, so the largest sine it can digitize cleanly is 3.3 / 2.8284 = 1.167 Vrms. The table gives the ceiling for the three common logic supplies.
| ADC input range | Max sine Vrms | Max sine Vp |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8 V | 0.636 | 0.900 |
| 3.3 V | 1.167 | 1.650 |
| 5.0 V | 1.768 | 2.500 |
The margin around these limits matters. Signals rarely sit centered, op-amp outputs stop short of the rails, and a trace that looks fine on a scope can still clip the converter because it rides on a DC offset. Leave headroom below the peak to peak ceiling rather than designing to it.
Why meters and scopes disagree
A true-RMS meter computes the heating value of whatever shape you show it, so it agrees with the tables above. Cheaper meters average the rectified wave and are calibrated so the display matches RMS for a sine only. Show such a meter a square wave and it reads about 11 percent high; a triangle reads about 4 percent low. That wave shape tax is why two meters on the same node can disagree with no one at fault.
Ripple on a DC supply is the other place the units meet. A bench supply spec might read 5 mVpp of ripple, a swing number taken from a scope, while a true-RMS meter on the same rail reports about 1.7 mV of RMS noise for a sine-shaped ripple. Neither reading is wrong; they answer different questions.
When a datasheet quotes peak to peak on an analog output, read it as a swing budget. A sensor that swings 2 Vpp into a 3.3 V converter has used most of the range and still fits; the same sensor at 4 Vpp does not, whatever its RMS value happens to be.
Traps that skew the number
- Sine factors on other shapes. The 2.828 multiplier belongs to sine waves. A triangle at 10 Vpp is 2.887 Vrms, and the sine formula reports 3.536, a 22 percent error.
- Vp read as Vpp. Half or double the truth, depending on direction. Confirm whether the datasheet means peak or peak to peak before multiplying.
- Probe setting mismatches. A 10x probe with the scope channel left at 1x shows one tenth of the signal, and the reverse shows ten times. The trace looks alive either way, which is what makes this one sneaky.
- dBu and dBV confusion. dBu references 0.7746 V and dBV references 1 V, so +4 dBu and +4 dBV differ by 2.2 dB, roughly a 29 percent swing difference.
- Ground clips on live circuits. A scope ground clip tied to a live chassis can short the supply through the probe. Check the outlet before the probe.
One habit prevents most of these: write the unit next to the number. Vpp, Vp and Vrms differ by fixed factors, and a factor only applies once the wave shape is named.
Neighboring tools for the rest of the trace
The electrical pages on this site share the same shape: one input, fixed factors, the rest computed. The Ohm's law calculator ties voltage to current and resistance, the voltage divider calculator scales a signal down through two resistors, and the voltage drop calculator follows voltage along cable runs. For the power side, the dBm to watts converter covers RF levels, the amps to watts calculator handles power factor work, and the frequency calculator takes care of the time axis of the same trace.
Frequently asked questions
How do I convert RMS to peak to peak voltage?
For a sine wave multiply by 2.828: 120 V RMS becomes 120 x 2.8284 = 339.4 V peak to peak. Use 3.464 for a triangle and 2.000 for a square.
What is 120 VAC in peak to peak?
339.4 V. The outlet peaks at 169.7 V above zero and 169.7 V below, and the full trough-to-crest swing is 339.4 V.
What is 10 Vpp in RMS?
For a sine, 10 / 2.8284 = 3.536 Vrms. A triangle at the same swing is 2.887 Vrms and a square is 5.000 Vrms.
Is 230 V mains 650 V peak to peak?
Yes, 230 x 2.8284 = 650.5 V. The swing clears 600 V on every cycle, which is why mains insulation is rated far above the 230 V label.
Why is peak to peak twice the peak?
For any wave centered on zero, the crest sits Vp above zero and the trough sits Vp below it, so the trough-to-crest distance is 2 x Vp.
Does peak to peak voltage apply to DC?
Not to a steady level. The term shows up as ripple: a 5 V rail wobbling 40 mV each way carries 80 mV of ripple Vpp.
What is 1 Vrms in peak to peak?
2.828 V for a sine, 3.464 V for a triangle and 2.000 V for a square, because the crest factor depends on the wave shape.
Can a multimeter measure peak to peak?
Almost none do. A true-RMS meter reads Vrms, and an oscilloscope is the instrument that reads Vpp directly from the trace.
Why does my oscilloscope show 10 times the voltage?
A 10x probe multiplies the signal tenfold at the input, and the channel must be set to 10x to divide it back out. A 1x channel setting leaves the display ten times high.
How many volts peak to peak is audio line level?
+4 dBu is about 1.228 Vrms, which comes to 3.47 V peak to peak for a sine. Consumer levels near 1 Vrms come to 2.83 V.
What is the peak to peak voltage of a 5 V clock signal?
5 V, measured from 0 V to 5 V. Because the wave is offset from zero, its RMS at a 50 percent duty cycle is 3.536 V, not 5 V.
Is Vpp the same as 2 x Vrms?
Only for a square wave. For a sine Vpp is 2.828 x Vrms and for a triangle it is 3.464 x Vrms.
Why do datasheets quote both Vpp and Vrms?
Vpp gives the swing budget against supply rails and converter range; Vrms gives the power. Same signal, two different questions.
Spotted a wrong number or a broken result?
More Tech tools
- Amp-Hour Calculator
- Amps to kVA Calculator
- Audio File Size Calculator: WAV, MP3 and Storage Time
- Bandwidth Calculator
- Battery Charge Time Calculator
- Battery Life Calculator
- Bits to Bytes Converter
- CFM Calculator
- Capacitance
- Capacitor Calculator
- Current Calculator
- Data Transfer Calculator
- Data Usage Calculator
- Download Time Calculator
- Downtime Cost Calculator
- Electric Charge Calculator
Fee schedules, rates and rules change without notice. Always confirm important figures with the official source before you rely on them.