Diopter to mm Calculator
Focal length in millimeters is 1000 divided by the power in diopters, so a +4.00 lens focuses at 250 mm. The calculator also runs backward from a focal length, adds stacked close-up filters, and converts a glasses prescription to the power at the cornea.
Close-up filters to stack
| Result | |
| Focal length | |
| Focal length in inches | |
| Power in diopters | |
| Working distance at infinity focus | |
| Magnification with your camera lens | |
| Combined focal length with your camera lens | |
| Power at the cornea after vertex correction |
All math runs in your browser, nothing is uploaded.
Enter a lens power to get focal length in millimeters and inches, add stacked close-up filters, or convert a glasses prescription to the power at the cornea.
Key takeaways
- Focal length in mm = 1000 / diopters, so +1.00 D is 1,000 mm, +2.00 D is 500 mm and +4.00 D is 250 mm
- Stacked close-up filters add their diopters: a +1 on a +2 is +3 D, which puts the working distance at 333.3 mm
- Magnification at infinity focus is host focal length in mm times diopters divided by 1000, so a 100 mm lens with +4 D gives 0.40x
- A +10.00 D glasses prescription at a 12 mm vertex delivers 11.36 D at the cornea, and a -8.00 D lens delivers -7.30 D
- The formula assumes a thin lens and says nothing about edge sharpness, field of view or eye health
On this page
- What a Diopter Measures
- The Formula, Both Directions
- Reading Glasses: What the Number on the Rack Means
- Close-Up Filters: Stacking Adds Diopters
- Magnification and Working Distance Together
- Vertex Distance: Why +10.00 D Is Not +10.00 D at the Eye
- Worked Examples You Can Check
- Where the Conversion Stops Being True
What a Diopter Measures
A diopter is one divided by the focal length in meters. Flip it into millimeters and you get the formula this page runs on: focal length in mm = 1000 / diopters. A +1.00 lens focuses parallel light at 1,000 mm, a +2.00 lens at 500 mm, a +4.00 lens at 250 mm.
The unit is not one of the named units in the International System. NIST's SI units page lists the meter as the base unit of length and the 22 derived units with special names, and the diopter is not among them, so optical power is formally inverse meters, m-1.
Sign matters. A plus lens converges light and has a real focus. A minus lens diverges it, and the focus sits behind the glass where no screen can catch it, so the focal length is written negative. A -2.00 D lens has a focal length of -500 mm.
| Power | Focal length | In inches | Where you meet it |
|---|---|---|---|
| +0.50 D | 2,000 mm | 78.7 in | Weak task lamp magnifier |
| +1.00 D | 1,000 mm | 39.4 in | Mild reader, +1 close-up filter |
| +1.50 D | 666.7 mm | 26.2 in | Reader, +1.5 filter |
| +2.00 D | 500 mm | 19.7 in | Common drugstore reader |
| +2.50 D | 400 mm | 15.7 in | Reader for small print |
| +3.00 D | 333.3 mm | 13.1 in | Strongest common reader |
| +4.00 D | 250 mm | 9.8 in | +4 close-up filter, bench loupe |
| +5.00 D | 200 mm | 7.9 in | Thread counter, jeweler work |
| +8.00 D | 125 mm | 4.9 in | Strong loupe |
| +10.00 D | 100 mm | 3.9 in | High-power loupe, +10 reading add |
| -2.00 D | -500 mm | -19.7 in | Nearsighted glasses, virtual focus |
The Formula, Both Directions
Go the other way with D = 1000 / f. A 300 mm lens is 3.33 D, a 250 mm lens is 4.00 D, a 40 mm eyepiece is 25.00 D. The two directions are exact inverses.
The relation is a hyperbola, not a line. Doubling power halves distance: +2.00 D sits at 500 mm, +4.00 D at 250 mm. Halving power doubles it: +0.50 D sits at 2,000 mm. That is why a step from +2.00 to +3.00 moves the near point from 500 mm to 333.3 mm, while +1.00 to +2.00 moves it from 1,000 mm to 500 mm.
The error in forum posts is averaging focal lengths. A +1.00 and a +4.00 filter together average 1,000 mm and 250 mm into 625 mm, which would be 1.60 D. The real answer is 5.00 D, or 200 mm, because powers add and focal lengths do not. For thin lenses in contact, D total = D1 + D2 + D3, the rule Michigan Technological University gives for stacked close-up filters. Two +2.00 filters make +4.00 D and 250 mm, not 500 mm.
Reading Glasses: What the Number on the Rack Means
Over-the-counter readers run from +1.00 D to +3.00 D, according to the Mayo Clinic's presbyopia treatment page. The label is a lens power, not a magnification factor, so a +2.00 pair is not 2x anything. It is a lens that focuses parallel light at 500 mm.
That number sets the distance where the lens leaves the eye with nothing to do. Hold a page at 500 mm through a +2.00 lens and the print arrives as parallel rays. Move it to 400 mm and the page sends 1000 / 400 = 2.50 D into the lens; the lens adds 2.00 D, so the eye supplies the last 0.50 D.
| Reader power | Focus distance | In inches | Typical use |
|---|---|---|---|
| +1.00 D | 1,000 mm | 39.4 in | Desktop monitor at arm's length |
| +1.50 D | 666.7 mm | 26.2 in | Book held out |
| +2.00 D | 500 mm | 19.7 in | Newspaper, common first pair |
| +2.50 D | 400 mm | 15.7 in | Paperback, phone screen |
| +3.00 D | 333.3 mm | 13.1 in | Fine print, close handwork |
Two cautions. The rack power is the same for both eyes, and a spherical reader cannot correct astigmatism. The number also assumes the lens sits about 12 mm from the cornea, the vertex distance described below. Magnifying spectacles are Class I devices under 21 CFR 886.5840, a category the FDA exempts from premarket notification.
Close-Up Filters: Stacking Adds Diopters
Screw-in close-up filters for cameras are sold by diopter: +1, +2, +4, often as a set of three. The filter does not change the camera lens, it adds power in front of it.
With the host lens at infinity, working distance comes from the filter alone: 1000 / D millimeters. A +4 filter puts the subject at 250 mm and a +2 at 500 mm. Stack a +1 on a +2 and the pair acts as +3 D, so the distance drops to 333.3 mm. That sum rule is the one in Michigan Technological University's close-up lens guide, with the caveat that the filters need to sit close together.
| Filters stacked | Total power | Working distance | Magnification on a 100 mm lens |
|---|---|---|---|
| +1 alone | 1.00 D | 1,000.0 mm | 0.10x |
| +2 alone | 2.00 D | 500.0 mm | 0.20x |
| +4 alone | 4.00 D | 250.0 mm | 0.40x |
| +1 and +2 | 3.00 D | 333.3 mm | 0.30x |
| +1 and +4 | 5.00 D | 200.0 mm | 0.50x |
| +2 and +4 | 6.00 D | 166.7 mm | 0.60x |
| +1, +2 and +4 | 7.00 D | 142.9 mm | 0.70x |
| +4 and +4 | 8.00 D | 125.0 mm | 0.80x |
Put the stronger filter closest to the camera lens, and stop at two in most cases, since three or more cost contrast. A +7 stack leaves 142.9 mm of room, about 5.6 in, close enough to shade the subject with the lens hood.
Magnification and Working Distance Together
At infinity focus, magnification is host focal length in millimeters times diopters, divided by 1000: m = F x D / 1000. A 100 mm lens with +4 D gives 0.40x. A 50 mm lens with the same filter gives 0.20x. Filters do more on long lenses, which is why they pair with 85 mm to 200 mm glass rather than a wide angle.
Two setups can reach the same magnification with different room. A 100 mm lens with +4 D gives 0.40x at 250 mm. A 200 mm lens with +2 D also gives 0.40x, with 500 mm of working distance and easier light.
Combined focal length is 1000 / (1000 / F + D). A 100 mm lens with +4 D becomes 71.4 mm, with +3 D it becomes 76.9 mm, and a 50 mm lens with +3 D becomes 43.5 mm. Focusing the host lens closer than infinity adds magnification and shortens the distance.
Hand magnifiers use a different convention, M = D / 4 + 1 on a 250 mm reference: +5 D is sold as 2.25x, +10 D as 3.5x, +2 D as 1.5x. That is angular magnification, not the linear ratio a photographer means by 0.40x.
Vertex Distance: Why +10.00 D Is Not +10.00 D at the Eye
A prescription is written for a lens sitting 12 mm to 14 mm in front of the cornea. That gap is the vertex distance, and moving the lens changes the power the eye receives: F at the cornea = F at the glasses / (1 - d x F), with d in meters.
Run +10.00 D at 12 mm. The denominator is 1 - 0.012 x 10 = 0.88, and 10 / 0.88 = 11.36 D, so the eye sees 1.36 D more plus than the frame says. Run -8.00 D: 1 - 0.012 x (-8) = 1.096, and -8 / 1.096 = -7.30 D, which is 0.70 D weaker. Plus powers gain as the lens nears the eye, minus powers lose, and both grow with the square of the power.
| Glasses power | Power at the cornea, 12 mm | Change |
|---|---|---|
| +4.00 D | +4.20 D | +0.20 D |
| +8.00 D | +8.85 D | +0.85 D |
| +10.00 D | +11.36 D | +1.36 D |
| +12.00 D | +14.02 D | +2.02 D |
| -4.00 D | -3.82 D | +0.18 D |
| -8.00 D | -7.30 D | +0.70 D |
| -10.00 D | -8.93 D | +1.07 D |
| -12.00 D | -10.49 D | +1.51 D |
The National Academy of Opticianry teaches the same conversion through focal length: f = 1000 / D, add the change in vertex distance, then D = 1000 / f. Its shortcut, D squared times the shift in millimeters divided by 1000, gives 0.2 D for +10.00 moved 2 mm. The exact figure for 12 mm to 14 mm is 11.63 - 11.36 = 0.27 D.
Worked Examples You Can Check
Example 1, +3.00 D on a 50 mm lens. Focal length is 1000 / 3 = 333.3 mm, or 13.1 in. Magnification is 50 x 3 / 1000 = 0.15x. The combined focal length is 1000 / (1000 / 50 + 3) = 43.5 mm.
Example 2, +1 and +4 stacked on a 100 mm lens. The powers add to 5.00 D, so the working distance is 200.0 mm, or 7.9 in. Magnification is 100 x 5 / 1000 = 0.50x, and the combined focal length is 1000 / (10 + 5) = 66.7 mm.
Example 3, +9.00 D at a 14 mm vertex. The denominator is 1 - 0.014 x 9 = 0.874, and 9 / 0.874 = 10.30 D at the cornea. At 12 mm the same glasses give 9 / (1 - 0.108) = 10.09 D, so 2 mm of standoff is worth 0.21 D in this range.
Example 4, backward. A 300 mm lens is 1000 / 300 = 3.33 D, a 167 mm lens is 5.99 D, and a 40 mm eyepiece is 25.00 D. The widget returns those same numbers in the reverse mode.
Where the Conversion Stops Being True
The formula assumes a thin lens, with all the bending in one plane. Real filters have two surfaces, a few millimeters of glass and a ring that holds them apart. Stack two and the gap pushes the true power a little below the simple sum. For +1 and +2 the error is well under a tenth of a diopter, and it grows with stronger filters and longer stacks.
Diopters say nothing about field of view, edge sharpness, fringing or transmission. Two +4 filters from different makers carry the same number and make different pictures.
For eyes, this arithmetic is a check, not a prescription. A refraction carries a sphere, a cylinder, an axis and a reading add for each eye, plus a vertex distance someone measured. Astigmatism needs a cylinder that no spherical conversion supplies. If a number here disagrees with your prescription, the prescription wins.
Frequently asked questions
How do I convert diopters to mm?
Divide 1000 by the power in diopters. A +4.00 D lens gives 1000 / 4 = 250 mm, a +2.00 D lens gives 500 mm, and a +1.00 D lens gives 1,000 mm. The calculator above does the same division and also shows the result in inches.
What is 1 diopter in millimeters?
1,000 mm, which is 39.4 in. One diopter is defined as the power that focuses parallel light at a distance of one meter, so the focal length in millimeters is 1000 / 1 = 1,000.
How many diopters is a 300 mm lens?
3.33 D, from 1000 / 300. A 250 mm lens is 4.00 D, a 200 mm lens is 5.00 D, and a 500 mm lens is 2.00 D. The relation is a reciprocal, so equal steps in millimeters are not equal steps in diopters.
Do stacked close-up filters add their diopters?
Yes. A +1 filter on a +2 filter behaves as +3 D, so the working distance at infinity focus is 1000 / 3 = 333.3 mm. Michigan Technological University's close-up lens guide gives the same sum rule, with the note that the filters need to sit close together.
What is the working distance of a +4 close-up filter?
250 mm, or 9.8 in, when the camera lens is focused at infinity. A +2 filter gives 500 mm and a +1 filter gives 1,000 mm. Focusing the host lens closer than infinity shortens the distance and raises the magnification.
What magnification does a +4 filter give on a 100 mm lens?
0.40x, from 100 x 4 / 1000. The same filter on a 50 mm lens gives 0.20x, and on a 200 mm lens it gives 0.80x. Longer host lenses get more magnification from the same diopter.
Are +1.00 reading glasses the same as 1x magnification?
No. A +1.00 lens focuses at 1,000 mm and is about 1.25x by the hand magnifier convention of D / 4 + 1. The 1x label on a magnifier is a marketing convention, not a diopter value, so the two numbers do not convert directly.
Does vertex distance matter for a low prescription?
Below about 4.00 D the shift is small. A +4.00 D lens at 12 mm delivers +4.20 D to the cornea, a 0.20 D change that most people cannot detect. At +10.00 D the same 12 mm gap turns into +11.36 D, a 1.36 D change that matters.
What is the difference between focal length and reading distance?
Focal length is where the lens focuses parallel light, so a +2.00 lens focuses at 500 mm. Reading distance is where you hold the page, and if that is 400 mm the page sends 2.50 D into the lens, leaving 0.50 D for your eye to supply.
Can I use this to convert a glasses prescription to contacts?
Only as a check. The formula converts power between two planes, but a contact lens fit also depends on base curve, diameter, corneal shape and a refraction done at the corneal plane. Use the number to sanity check a conversion, not to order lenses.
Why does a +10.00 D prescription get stronger in a contact lens?
Because the contact sits on the cornea instead of 12 mm in front of it. The conversion gives 10 / (1 - 0.012 x 10) = 11.36 D, so the contact needs more plus to deliver the same power to the eye.
What does a negative diopter mean?
A minus lens diverges light. A -2.00 D lens has a focal length of -500 mm, meaning the rays appear to come from a point 500 mm behind the lens, so the focus is virtual and no screen can catch it.
How do I go from millimeters back to diopters?
Divide 1000 by the focal length in millimeters. A 167 mm lens is 5.99 D, a 300 mm lens is 3.33 D, and a 1,000 mm lens is 1.00 D. The widget has a mode for this direction.
Is a +3.00 reader the same as a 3x magnifier?
No. A +3.00 lens focuses at 333.3 mm and comes out near 1.75x by the D / 4 + 1 convention, far from 3x. A true 3x magnifier would need about +8.00 D on that convention.
Why do two +2.00 filters give 250 mm and not 500 mm?
Because powers add and focal lengths do not. The pair is +4.00 D, and 1000 / 4 = 250 mm. Averaging the two focal lengths of 500 mm would give the wrong answer, 500 mm, instead of the correct 250 mm.
Spotted a wrong number or a broken result?
More Converters tools
- 12 Hour to 24 Hour Converter Calculator
- Acres to Hectares Converter
- Acres to Linear Feet Calculator
- Acres to Square Feet Converter
- Activation Energy Calculator
- Air Density Calculator
- Amps to Watts Calculator
- Angle Converter
- Angle of Depression Calculator
- Angle of Elevation Calculator
- Area Calculator
- Area Converter
- BPM to FPS Calculator
- BPM to Hz Calculator
- BPS to Hz Calculator
- BTU per Hour to Tons Converter
Fee schedules, rates and rules change without notice. Always confirm important figures with the official source before you rely on them.